Dozens of FBI Records Reportedly Missing From Epstein File Release, Including Interviews Linked to Trump Accuser

A review of recently released Department of Justice files related to Jeffrey Epstein indicates that dozens of FBI witness interview records appear to be missing from the public archive.

An evidence index previously provided to attorneys representing Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell lists approximately 325 FBI interview summaries, commonly referred to as “302” reports.

However, more than 90 of those interview records do not appear in the publicly accessible collection of documents. That represents over a quarter of the entries listed in the official log.

Among the records that appear to be absent are three interview reports connected to a woman who alleged that Epstein repeatedly abused her beginning when she was around 13 years old. The same woman also reportedly accused former President Donald Trump of sexual assault decades ago.

A Democratic member of Congress raised concerns about whether the Department of Justice fully complied with legal requirements mandating transparency in releasing Epstein-related materials. The lawmaker questioned whether all required documentation had been made available to the public.

The White House has rejected the allegations involving Trump, describing them as false and sensationalized. Officials also stated that some documents contain claims that have previously been denied.

A spokesperson for the Department of Justice said no records were deleted and maintained that all responsive documents were produced. According to the department, materials not included in the public release were either duplicates, legally privileged, redacted for victim protection, or part of ongoing federal investigations.

The missing documents relate to FBI “302” reports, which summarize interviews conducted by federal agents. These reports are considered foundational elements in criminal investigations because they document what witnesses and victims told investigators.

Court filings show that the woman connected to the missing interview reports first contacted federal authorities shortly after Epstein’s 2019 arrest. She later met with FBI agents and described alleged abuse that began in her early teenage years. According to documents that are publicly available, her attorney expressed concern about naming prominent individuals due to fear of retaliation.

Additional evidence logs reference further interviews conducted later that year, along with sets of interview notes. Those specific documents do not appear in the publicly posted archive.

Separate legal filings involving Epstein’s estate describe similar allegations made by a plaintiff identified under a pseudonym. The lawsuit alleges that Epstein introduced her to wealthy and prominent individuals and that she experienced sexual abuse. The filing does not name the individuals involved.

Records show that the woman was deemed ineligible for compensation under the Epstein Victims’ Compensation Program. The reason for that decision has not been publicly clarified. Her lawsuit was later voluntarily dismissed, and it has been reported that she received a financial settlement from the estate.

It remains unclear what actions, if any, federal investigators ultimately took regarding her allegations.

Some Epstein victims have expressed frustration that their own FBI interview summaries are not visible in the document release. One survivor wrote to a federal court arguing that incomplete disclosure continues a pattern of secrecy surrounding the case.

The Department of Justice has stated that certain documents were temporarily removed for redactions to protect victims and may have been re-uploaded. Observers note that files have been added and removed from the public site since the initial release.

Legal experts emphasize that missing interview summaries raise concerns because they are central to understanding the scope and findings of the investigation into Epstein and his associates.