ArticleIran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi is currently in Muscat, Oman, where indirect talks between Iran and the United States are expected to begin.
The negotiations come at a critical moment, with heightened regional tensions and growing military pressure in the Middle East.
Despite the diplomatic atmosphere, expectations for a concrete breakthrough remain low.
Based on the structure and conditions under which these talks are unfolding, the negotiations appear less about reaching a decisive agreement and more about buying time for both sides.
Iran is seeking to delay escalation while preserving its strategic leverage, particularly as it faces mounting military pressure.
At the same time, Washington also appears interested in gaining time — even if only briefly — to complete its military and political calculations in the region.
Recent remarks by former U.S. President Donald Trump are particularly revealing. He stated that Iran is pursuing negotiations out of fear of a potential U.S. military strike,
especially as American warships move closer to the region. U.S. naval assets could reach operational positions in the Middle East within approximately ten days, suggesting that no immediate strike is likely before military preparations are finalized.
For its part, Iran insists that the talks remain strictly limited to the nuclear file, firmly rejecting any discussion of its ballistic missile program or regional influence.
Tehran views these issues as non-negotiable elements of its national defense.
Even if both Washington and Tehran currently prefer to avoid direct war — and even if Iran is willing to offer limited concessions to prevent conflict — the risk of escalation remains high.
Israel’s position significantly complicates the diplomatic landscape.
Israeli leaders have openly stated that Israel is not bound by any agreement the United States may reach with Iran in Muscat.
They have made clear that Israel will not accept a deal that restricts its military freedom of action.Ahead of the Oman talks, the U.S. envoy involved in the negotiations visited Israel, where Israeli officials reportedly presented several red lines.
These include demands that Iran’s ballistic missile capabilities and its support for allied armed groups in the region be included in any agreement.
Israel considers Iran’s missile program as dangerous as its nuclear activities and insists on limiting missile range to prevent potential strikes on Israeli territory.
Israeli military messaging has also intensified. Senior defense officials have publicly stated that Israel is prepared for both offensive and defensive action.
Regional intelligence assessments suggest that Israel — rather than the United States — may be the actor most seriously considering military action against Iran.Given these dynamics,
any agreement perceived by Israel as weak or incomplete could prompt unilateral Israeli action, potentially dragging the United States into a wider conflict and collapsing any diplomatic progress.
In light of all available indicators, the current Iran–US negotiations in Oman appear to be a tactical pause rather than a strategic solution — an effort to gain time amid rising military, political, and regional pressures, rather than a path toward a durable settlement.—
About the Author
Discover more from
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
